Modded Minecraft Wiki:Votes for Featured Articles/2013

December 2013

Railcraft Tank

• Support — Celestial Oblivion (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2013 (CET)
• Support — Fairly sure I nominated this before and was sad to see it lose, hope it wins this time as it is pretty good. ƒelinoel ~ (Talk) 19:00, 4 November 2013 (CET)
• Support — DeathCamel57 (talk) 10:30, 7 November 2013 (US EDT)

October 2013

Coin of Fortune

• Support — Tristan1301 (talk) 18:17, 16 September 2013 (CEST)
• Oppose — I dunno, I've seen better written articles... . ƒelinoel_ 05:44, 18 September 2013 (CEST)

September 2013

Portal Modifier

• Support — Seeing as there's no nominees yet, I'd like to nominate the article I just wrote. I think it's quite tidy and well-structured. It's about the Portal Modifier block from the EnhancedPortals 2 mod, which was part of the 1.5.2 beta pack. RZR0 ( Talk | Contributions) 16:01, 18 August 2013 (CEST)
• Support — Well written and I did always enjoy Stargate. . ƒelinoel_ 06:55, 20 August 2013 (CEST)
• Support — Hehe -~ZL123 :O~- (talk) 07:33, 21 August 2013 (CEST)

July 2013

Minium Stone

• Support — A tidy and informative article. RZR0 ( Talk | Contributions) 11:16, 15 June 2013 (CEST)
• Support — Minium Stones are underestimated. Minken (talk) 02:12, 19 June 2013 (CEST)

June 2013

Holy Hand Grenade

• Support — And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, "O LORD, bless this Thy hand grenade that with it Thou mayest blow Thine enemies to tiny bits, in Thy mercy." And the LORD did grin and the people did feast upon the lambs and sloths and carp and anchovies and orangutans and breakfast cereals, and fruit bats and large chu...
  And the LORD spake, saying, "First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin, then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it." ƒelinoel ~ (Talk) 04:32, 1 May 2013 (CEST)
• Support —You really can't argue against that...

ZER0-0
"When there is nothing left to turn to, there is always insanity"

18:29, 1 May 2013 (CEST)

• Support — That poor bunny... RZR0 ( Talk | Contributions) 22:41, 1 May 2013 (CEST)
• Oppose —Latimew333 (talk) 21:05, 2 May 2013 (CEST)
• Oppose — That's all fun and games, but the article is really not up to standards. Part of the text is copied directly from the Xeno's Reliquary MC Thread. It is poorly written, way too informal and does not explain the item sufficiently. The information is scattered and all over the place, making it difficult to follow. It's also missing some smaller details like data value or the weapons category. While the item may be entertaining, I think we're showcasing well-written articles, not the items themselves. We want to encourage people to write good articles, and also show the wiki in its best light. Artsja (talk) 22:00, 2 May 2013 (CEST)

Why not clean it up to your liking? ƒelinoel ~ (Talk) 22:23, 2 May 2013 (CEST)

I certainly would if I had the time for it right now. I would like to be able to spend more time here in general but at the moment I can't. A nomination should not be regarded as a prompt/request for improvement though ((not implying you did that here, talking more generally)). I just explained why I oppose featuring this article in its current state. Artsja (talk) 22:46, 2 May 2013 (CEST)

True, though I think we both know the only reason why I nominated it was because of the reference lol . ƒelinoel_ 01:49, 4 May 2013 (CEST)

• Oppose — I agree with Artsja, it might be an amusing item, but thats not what featured articles are for. Iamtk421 (talk) 07:27, 3 May 2013 (CEST)

Industrial Blast Furnace

• Support — A tidy and neatly organized article that is up-to-date, informative, and relatively well-written. Artsja (talk) 17:13, 1 June 2013 (CEST)
• Support — Agreed, a very clean article indeed. RZR0 ( Talk | Contributions) 18:19, 1 June 2013 (CEST)

May 2013

Automatic Wiremill

• Support — A very clean and tidy article. Well written and illustrated. RZR0 (talk) 01:51, 3 April 2013 (CEST)

Generator

• Support — A very useful article that is well written with useful information and great grammar and format.

ZER0-0
"When there is nothing left to turn to, there is always insanity"

02:18, 11 April 2013 (CEST)

Comments

No winner!. ƒelinoel_ 04:02, 1 May 2013 (CEST)

April 2013

Nuclear Reactor

• Support — This article is well written and very extensive. It also has a lot of illustrations that are very nicely distributed. RZR0 (talk) 02:28, 6 March 2013 (CET)
• Support — Extensive information and looks like something that would be very useful before delving into nuclear power. Embri (talk) 04:37, 10 March 2013 (CET)
• Support — Cause that's what IC2 (without any child mods/Solar panel thingies/GregTech) considers to be an endgame source of energy. A must-know for every FTB player out there. OstPavel (talk) 09:55, 24 March 2013 (CET)
• Oppose — It really needs some pictures of "Safe" reactors. Those would make it much much easier NOT to blow up a large area.

ZER0-0
"When there is nothing left to turn to, there is always insanity"

02:52, 29 March 2013 (CET)

Ore Processor

• Support — Very informative tutorial that helps new players learn about and compare the various yield increasing parts of the various mods SmartAlec105 (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2013 (CET)
• Support — Very nice indeed, I didn't know about this article. RZR0 (talk) 02:47, 10 March 2013 (CET)
• Neutral — I don't know... it seems a little boring and hard to read, could use a picture or two. ƒelinoel ~ (Talk) 03:54, 10 March 2013 (CET)
• Oppose — A lack of any images and inconsistent capitalization makes this article look unfinished. The information is good but the presentation isn't quite there. A table comparing the various machine/energy costs vs. outputs would be a tremendous addition. Embri (talk) 04:37, 10 March 2013 (CET)

Crop

• Support — Very good tutorial with many pictures to explain the agriculture system of IC2
• Support — Without a doubt one of the nicest articles I've seen around. very well structured and illustrated. RZR0 (talk) 13:19, 10 March 2013 (CET)
• Support — Nicely written, not to overwhelming, pretty good article Gerbalb (talk) 16:54, 10 March 2013 (CET)
• Oppose — This article still needs alot of work to become featured. There is inconsistent capitalization and many undefined and unofficial terms, like weeds and "Double-Crops"

ZER0-0
"When there is nothing left to turn to, there is always insanity"

02:55, 29 March 2013 (CET)

• Support — ƒelinoel ~ (Talk)

Industrial Blast Furnace

• Support — A well written article that describes the set-up, powering, and usage of a complicate item.

ZER0-0
"When there is nothing left to turn to, there is always insanity"

15:54, 10 March 2013 (CET)

• Support — Very well-written.

Jeuvke (talk) 11:43, 17 March 2013 (CET)

Comments

Crop has won!

March 2013

Macerator

• Support — ZL123 (talk) 09:24, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
• Neutral — I don't know... it doesn't seem to have all the recipes for it I see in my Tech World modpack? Maybe if it got its recipes updated I would be able to decide to vote for it. felinoel 15:35, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Sickle

• Support — Artsja (talk) 16:38, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
• Support — A complete, well-written article. felinoel 17:32, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
• Support — Updated the images a bit. Now it's ready ;-) Kahless61 (talk) 02:52, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Geothermal Generator

• Support — --

§ ZER0 §
"'When there is nothing left to turn to, there is always insanity'"

02:24, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Sickle is the winner! . ƒelinoel_ 02:23, 6 March 2013 (CET)