Talk:Project Red

Do we need new pages for this mod?

Since the purpose of this mod is to basically recreate Redpower 2, do we really need to create new articles for items it adds that behave exactly like in Redpower 2? I'm working on the Nav template for this mod now and it would be a good thing to know further down the line. Celestial Oblivion (talk) 22:21, 10 March 2014 (CET) I'd go with yes, considering it's a new and different mod. Some of the items might also change in the future. There's no harm in copying the current pages and their history to use as the new pages though. In any case, that's just my opinion, maybe not everyone agrees. RZR0 ( Talk | Contributions) 22:50, 10 March 2014 (CET)

Well, we have some item pages sharing information if they are virtually identical. So we make a marble for Red Power 2 and Project Red and Underground Biomes? Regardless of the answer to that, I do think it would be better to link to the RedPower articles until someone actually rights articles specific to Project Red. Otherwise we have almost no pages for this mod nav. :p Celestial Oblivion (talk) 01:58, 11 March 2014 (CET)

I'd say if the blocks are identical, like marble and basalt, we can keep them on one page. However if there are notable differences in mechanics, we should separate the pages for obvious reasons. --dgelessus (talk · contribs) 07:07, 11 March 2014 (CET)